Spring Salmon and Seafood Limited [2017 UKUT 0205 (TCC) the Upper Tribunal (UT) upheld the decision that a terminal loss relief claim was not a stand alone claim.

The crux of the taxpayers argument was the decision of the Supreme Court in Cotter v HMRC (2013) UKSC 69.  As the terminal loss claim does not impact on the liability for the final period, the taxpayer contended that it did not form part of the Return and HMRC were wrong to disallow it.

The UT rejected this argument, instead preferring the decision in R (on the application of De Silva) v Revenue and Customs Commissioners 2016 EWCA Civ 40.

Comment

Given that De Silva is an income tax case, where the tax relief available on losses actually arises in the year of loss (rather than the year against which it is used, as under corporation tax rules), and the losses at stake are significant, it seems likely that the taxpayer will pursue the case further.

Not to be confused with Spring Salmon & Seafood Limited v HMRC [2016] UKUT 0313 - a PAYE/NICs case.

Links:

Spring Salmon and Seafood Limited [2017 UKUT 0205 (TCC)

Cotter v HMRC [2013] UKSC 69


 

Wouldn’t it be great and think how much TIME it would SAVE you if someone:

How about if that someone also:

Thousands of firms of accountants and advisers are already using www.rossmartin.co.uk as their primary TAX resource.

At a cost of just £1 per day, it’s a no brainer: FREE up your MIND and your TIME (and your wallet).

And...we run our Virtual Tax Partner support service, if you need assistance with a particular issue.