In Vermilion Holdings Limited v HMRC [2021] CSIH 45, the Inner House of the Court of Session found that replacement share options issued to a director were not made available by reason of his employment. The share options had originally been given to a consultant company in lieu of fees for advisory services. 

The case was appealed to the Supreme Court in 2023, their judgment is anticipated in October 2023.

Mr Noble, via Quest Advantage Limited (Quest), advised technology businesses on fundraising, business growth, acquisitions and divestments.

Subject to a limited 'friends and family' exception, section 471 ITEPA 2003 broadly states that where an option to acquire securities is made available by a person’s employer it is deemed to have been made available by reason of their employment. 

Share options granted to an employee or director by reason of their employment are ERS and can be subject to a number of Income Tax charges. 

The FTT found that the 2007 options were not ERS.

HMRC appealed to the Upper Tribunal (UT), which overturned the FTT decision finding that the options were ERS.

Vermilion appealed to the Court of Session which, by majority, found that the UT should not have disturbed the FTT conclusion. Vermilion’s appeal was allowed.

The majority of judges which allowed the appeal agreed with the FTT that it would be “anomalous, absurd and unjust” if the right or opportunity to acquire the 2007 option were to be treated as having been made available to Mr Noble by his employer.  

Comment

A useful decision for advisers on share and option awards, due to its review of the deeming provision in s.471(3), this wording applies 421B(3) too, in relation to share awards. It is not uncommon for advisers to be given share awards in start-ups in lieu of fees and this case confirms that provided that you are not intending to become a director or employee such shares are firmly outside the ERS regime.

Useful guides on this topic

Employment-Related Securities & Share Schemes
What are the tax consequences when a company gives shares to an employee or director? What are employment-related securities? What is best: shares or share options? How do you set up a share scheme?

ABC or alphabet shares: directors & employees
Can you set up different classes of shares? How do you create Alphabet or ABC shares? What are the rules in giving different classes of shares to directors and employees? 

EMI: Enterprise Management Incentive Scheme
What is the Enterprise Management Incentive (EMI) scheme? What's the difference between EMI and an unapproved share scheme?

Employment-Related Securities: What’s New? August 2021
HMRC have issued their latest Employment-Related Securities Bulletin which includes some useful tips. Here is our enhanced version with links to our guides.

Shares, securities & options: Tax compliance
What are the filing requirements for share-based remuneration? What needs reporting? When does it need reporting?  What penalties are there for late filing?

Directors share options were not employment-related securities
In Vermilion Holdings Limited v HMRC [2019] TC07077, the First Tier Tribunal (FTT) found that share options granted to a director were not Employment-Related Securities. They were not issued by reason of his employment.

Director's share options were 'by reason of employment'
In HMRC v Vermilion Holdings Limited v [2020] UKUT162, the Upper Tribunal (UT) held that share options granted to a director were Employment-Related Securities. The employment did not have to be the sole reason for the grant of the options, it was enough that it was one of the reasons.

External links

Vermilion Holdings Limited v HMRC [2021] CSIH 45


Small acorn
If you like our content come and join us.

Thousands of accountants and advisers and their clients use www.rossmartin.co.uk as their primary TAX resource.

Register with us now to receive our receive our FREE SME Topical Tax Update & newletter