In Payne & Ors v HMRC [2020] EWCA Civ 889, the Court of Appeal found that the VW Kombis and Vauxhall Vivaro were cars and not vans for the purpose of assessing employee car benefits.

There are special rules to value and tax the employment benefit of a Company Car or Company Van if provided by an employer.

For Benefit In Kind purposes, a van is:

  • A vehicle of a construction primarily suited to the conveyance of goods or burden of any description (but not including people) with a weight, which the vehicle is designed or adapted not to exceed when in normal use and travelling on a road laden, below 3,500 kilograms.

Coca-Cola provided a VW Kombi 1, a Kombi 2 and a Vauxhall Vivaro for its technicians.

  • Both had a dual capability of carrying passengers and sufficient payload for carrying cargo, but each had been modified for the technicians. The Vivaro had seats and a window added. Kombi 1 had partitions and Kombi 2 removable racking. Both Kombis already had removable seating as standard.
  • HMRC adjusted the employee's PAYE coding notices for car benefit and assessed the employer for Class 1A National Insurance Contributions (NICs). Coca-Cola and its employees appealed on the basis the vehicles were vans.

The FTT concluded, and on appeal by HMRC the Upper Tribunal (UT) agreed, that:

  • The Kombis were essentially minibuses, designed to carry people and therefore not vans. With modification, they became equally suitable for carrying goods and passengers.
  • The Vivaro was a van: it was more characteristic of a vehicle the construction of which was designed to carry goods.

HMRC appealed the decision on the Vivaro and the taxpayers appealed regarding the VW Kombis.

The Court of Appeal found that both types of vehicle were cars.

  • The vehicles must be looked at in their modified form, not as they were when they came off the production line.
  • As a result, the FTT and UT had not erred in law in treating the Kombis as cars and the Court of Appeal dismissed the taxpayers’ appeals.
  • The lower courts had erred in law regarding the Vivaro. They found "on a narrow balance" that it was primarily suited to the conveyance of goods, which was not enough, as primarily means “first and foremost”. Multi-purpose vehicles such as this may have no primary suitability at all.
  • Having weighed up all the facts the Court found that both types of vehicle were multi-purpose and neither was primarily suited to the conveyance of goods, meaning neither could be a van. There were no significant differences to set the Vivaro apart from the Kombis. HMRC’s appeal was allowed.

Links

Company Cars
Company car tax: How do you work out car benefit? How do you work out car fuel benefit? Are there savings for low emissions vehicles? How do you reduce car benefit? Cars and the tax tribunals and Top Tax Tips.

Vans and Commercial vehicles
What is the benefit in kind charge if you drive a company van? What is van fuel benefit? What is the tax on zero-emissions vans? A guide for subscribers.

Cars & Vans: VAT
What is a car for VAT? What is a van for VAT? What VAT can be recovered on a car that is bought? Leased? What about fuel? Or mileage reimbursements? 

External links

Payne & Ors v HMRC [2020] EWCA Civ 889


Squirrel ad


Are you enjoying our content? 

Thousands of accountants and advisers and their clients use www.rossmartin.co.uk as their primary TAX resource.

Register with us now to receive our unique FREE Tax Planning Tips and Advice Guide & our FREE OMB Newsletter.

 

 

Comments (2)

Rated 5 out of 5 based on 2 voters
This comment was minimized by the moderator on the site

Hi there, this is a tax case and its is really about direct taxes - i.e. income tax and PAYE. This makes it rather difficult to be of any assistance in respect of your questions;:
1. We cannot really comment on what the DVLA is going to do, these...

Hi there, this is a tax case and its is really about direct taxes - i.e. income tax and PAYE. This makes it rather difficult to be of any assistance in respect of your questions;:
1. We cannot really comment on what the DVLA is going to do, these vehicles appear to be cars for the purposes of direct tax at least, following the CoA decision. VAT is a separate issue.
2. and 3. Again, we cannot comment on behalf of the government.
4. That's an interesting point about speed limits, I think that is one for the police to decide, and they would probably do that after consulting with DVLA

Read More
Guest
This comment was minimized by the moderator on the site

Hello I have 4 questions
As the private owner of a VW Kombi and taking the ruling detailed above into account
1 will the DVLA be reclassifying kombis like mine,
2 will there be any change to the rate of vehicle excise license
3 will there be...

Hello I have 4 questions
As the private owner of a VW Kombi and taking the ruling detailed above into account
1 will the DVLA be reclassifying kombis like mine,
2 will there be any change to the rate of vehicle excise license
3 will there be any affect to a vehicles emission rating
4 will the ruling affect the speed limit differentiation as applies to vans/cars 60/70 on a dual carriageway & 50/60 on a single carriageway

Thanks in advance

Read More
Guest
There are no comments posted here yet

Leave your comments

  1. Posting comment as a guest.
Rate this post:
Attachments (0 / 3)
Share Your Location

 

Enjoying the Practical Tax content on www.rossmartin.co.uk? 

Sign up now to receive a unique FREE Tax Planning Tips and Advice Guide & our FREE Newsletter.

.Squirrel ad