When do the loan charge and disguised remuneration rules apply?

A summary to determine if the disguised remuneration rules and loan charge apply, how they apply, and what action needs to be taken.

What's new?

30 September 2020 is the final settlement date for outstanding disguised remuneration loans to which the loan charge applies. 

In August 2020 HMRC issued details of a new settlement opportunity for taxpayers with loans not subject to the loan charge. See Disguised Remuneration 2020 settlement opportunity

In September 2019 the Chancellor commissioned an independent review of the loan charge which was reported upon on 20 December 2019. This announced several changes included in Finance Act 2020. See Disguised remuneration loan charge (subscriber guide) for full details.

What is the loan charge?

  • Disguised remuneration loans taken out since 9 December 2010 (1999 prior to the review) which are not repaid by 5 April 2019 or settled by 30 September 2020 will be subject to a Loan charge on 5 April 2019.
    •  Unless they were taken out before 6 April 2016, were reasonably disclosed to HMRC and HMRC have not taken any action such as opening an enquiry or raising an assessment or determination.
  • Up until 1 January 2019 was possible to postpone the loan charge in certain restricted circumstances. It is now too late to postpone. See How to apply to postpone your loan charge.

What is a disguised remuneration loan?

  • Broadly, if you worked for someone as a paid director, employee or on a self employed basis and you agreed with them to receive a loan instead of any salary or wages, and the understanding was to be that you would never have to repay that loan, such a loan is described a disguised remuneration loan.
  • The aim of paying someone via a disguised remuneration loan is that you avoid tax and NIC and the employer avoids NICs.
  • If you are self employed it means that you might avoid income tax and Class 4 NICs.
  • Key features and selling points of disguised remuneration loans were that they would be written off 'tax-free' on death, meaning that no tax would ever be paid on your earnings. Alternatively, if you moved abroad the loan could be 'disappeared' with you and the offshore trust making the loan might also disappear.
  • Tax schemes or 'tax strategies' including disguised remuneration loan schemes have been mass-marketed over the last 20 years. The government has now introduced legislation designed to tackle scheme promoters and has also introduced a General Anti-Abuse Rule (GAAR).
  • Many of the providers, promoters and originators of these schemes have now not unsurprisingly disappeared or folded.
  • Many firms of accountants and advisers declined to sell these schemes. There is a fundamental difference of opinion between professional advisers as to whether it was ever ethical or morally right to advise people to avoid tax by converting earnings into non-repayable loans. 
  • In some industries low paid employees were paid with loans via umbrella and similar companies and some of these employees appear to be genuine victims and unintentional tax avoiders.

Why did HMRC not act sooner?

  • HMRC and parliament seem to have been extremely slow in noticing the rise of a massive tax avoidance industry in the UK.
  • We observe that many people do not understand trusts and most loan schemes used offshore trusts. 
  • HMRC has been litigating against the many different forms of disguised remuneration scheme since the 1990s: their view was that they did not work however litigation takes time.
  • The most high profile disguised remuneration court case in recent years involved the former Rangers football club. Players received loans instead of pay. The Supreme Court confirmed that the loans were disguised remuneration and subject to PAYE and NICs.
  • HMRC consequently offered loan settlement opportunities with the latest and current opportunity being launched in 2017. Many people who used loan schemes realised that receiving pay via a loan is a form of tax avoidance not intended by government and have consequently settled their loans with HMRC.
  • According to HMRC some 50,000 people are either refusing to settle, or are burying their heads in the sand or are pleading poverty.

How much will the loan charge be?

  • The loan charge is a charge on the amount of all outstanding loan balances on 5 April 2019: it will fall into the 2018/19 tax year unless an election is made by 30 September 2020 to spread the loans over 3 tax years.
  • The rate of charge will depend on the amount of loans taken and your other income in the year. For example if you have other income of £50,000 and loans of £100,000 the income tax on your loan is likely to be £40,000 and employee NIC £2,000.
  • It may be better to settle with HMRC than pay the loan charge.
  • On 20 December 2019 it was announced that time to pay arrangements could be agreed for those with no disposable assets and income below £50,000.

In more technical detail:

What are the Disguised Remuneration rules and when do they apply?

The employment income through third parties rules, also referred to as the 'Disguised remuneration' rules, are wide ranging anti-avoidance rules in Part 7A ITEPA 2003 which:

  • Provide for an accelerated employment tax and National Insurance (NIC) charge on a range of remuneration arrangements.
  • Were introduced to ensure that tax on employment income is not avoided or deferred through the use of trusts or sub-trusts or other intermediaries, e.g. Employee Benefit Trusts (EBTs), remuneration trusts, contractor loan schemes and Employer Financed Retirement Benefit Schemes (EFRBS).

What is disguised remuneration?

Disguised remuneration is defined by part 7A as where:

Employees:

  • A person "A" is a living employee, either former, existing or prospective, of another person "B".
  • There is an "arrangement" to which A (or any person linked to A) is a party to, or which otherwise covers / relates to A.
  • The arrangement is wholly or partly a means of providing the provision of rewards or recognition or loans in connection with A's employment.
  • A "relevant step" in pursuance of the arrangement is taken by a relevant person.

Self-employed and partners (from April 2017):

  • A person (T) is or has been carrying on a trade as a sole trader or partner.
  • There is an arrangement connected with that trade which is wholly or partly a means of providing ‘relevant benefits’ to T, someone connected to T or any other person where T will have the enjoyment.
  • The relevant benefit is connected directly or indirectly with a ‘qualifying third party payment’.
  • A tax advantage will be obtained by T (or a connected party) as a result.

See Disguised remuneration (subscriber) guide 

What is an Accelerated Payment notice?

  • The APN asks you to pay the amount of tax that is in dispute and HMRC then hold the money until the matter is resolved. It is therefore a payment on account. APN's are separate to the loan charge.

How can I settle disguised remuneration, EBT or contractor loans with HMRC?

There are currently two settlement options available. The Disguised remuneration settlement opportunity (the 'November 2017 settlement terms') remainsopen to all users of such schemes who registered before April 2019.

  • Settlement registration must have been completed and information provided to HMRC in respect of all loans by 5 April 2019, with the settlement completed by 30 September 2020, if the loan charge is to be avoided. HMRC have advised that anyone who did not register by this date will not be eligible for the November 2017 settlement terms and must pay the loan charge unless their loans are out of scope.

In August 2020 a second settlement opportunity was launched which applies to loans not subject to the loan charge. See Disguised Remuneration 2020 settlement opportunity

 What are the disguised remuneration settlement terms?

  • Income tax and class 1 primary national insurance (employees) or class 2 and 4 NICs (self-employed and partners) on the amount of the loans, at your marginal tax rate for the year(s) in which the loans were taken out.
  • Interest on the above.
  • See FAQs for Disguised remuneration settlements

Where to obtain human support

If you need assistance in dealing with HMRC enquiries, calculating your loan charge or negotiating a settlement with HMRC, contact the Virtual Tax Partner support team. 

Comments (7)

Rated 0 out of 5 based on 0 voters
This comment was minimized by the moderator on the site

It's panning out to be a Double Whammy of payments.

Q) Once you paid off the TaxMan and if you accept the 5% offer from these loan companies, is this likely to trigger an Inheritance tax bill for the written off loan?

Q) Say you don't accept...

It's panning out to be a Double Whammy of payments.

Q) Once you paid off the TaxMan and if you accept the 5% offer from these loan companies, is this likely to trigger an Inheritance tax bill for the written off loan?

Q) Say you don't accept the offer and get legal advise, this is going to cost bigtime as these company's know how to pay the system and will ride it out. (legal advise charge per hour, per letter every time) so just the first initial letters will cost £££s and will end up costing ££££s without an end result!

Q) if these loans were in trust, then don't the trustees have a legal obligation to act in the beneficiaries' best interest, clearly they are not doing this.

Can you not go after the Trustees and hold them accountable in the first place?

What ever happens it looks like this is going to cost some serious cash in legal fees alone, how about a Class action and pulling at the people affect and act as one!

Read More
Guest
This comment was minimized by the moderator on the site

If we have left UK and have no UK income, does it mean that the loan charge is the full amount they will calculate as the income for that year? Or will they combine them with our overseas income?

Guest
This comment was minimized by the moderator on the site

Thank you for the overview.
The HMRC summary letter sent in May still includes the 2008/2009 and 2009/2010 years despite the Gov review.

Can one opt not to pay any loan issue before Dwc 2010 as per the Gov review?

The letter also asks to...

Thank you for the overview.
The HMRC summary letter sent in May still includes the 2008/2009 and 2009/2010 years despite the Gov review.

Can one opt not to pay any loan issue before Dwc 2010 as per the Gov review?

The letter also asks to agree to Inheretance Tax on the loans, which takes the liability to almost 100% of money earned in those years.

Do you have any advice on this please?

Read More
Guest
This comment was minimized by the moderator on the site

What if the co can not afford to repay or worse has been liquidated. Where does this leave the directors or former directors who were involved in the EFRB scheme?

Guest
This comment was minimized by the moderator on the site

Client received a loan pre 9 Dec 2010 therefore I do not believe loan charge is applicable any more. HMRC have contacted this week asking if client wants to settle still.....they have said that when the trust is wound up the tax and national...

Client received a loan pre 9 Dec 2010 therefore I do not believe loan charge is applicable any more. HMRC have contacted this week asking if client wants to settle still.....they have said that when the trust is wound up the tax and national insurance will then become due......They want an "options" form completing to confirm whether the client still wants to settle ........have you heard of anyone else receiving emails such as this?

Read More
Guest
This comment was minimized by the moderator on the site

We have not heard of anyone else receiving such emails yet.

Guest
This comment was minimized by the moderator on the site

Thanks for this informative article. Once one has settled with HMRC, what becomes of the horrid loan scheme. Can they come back and ask you to pay the loan back, again, over paying to HMRC and the loan sharks? Surely that can’t be lawful, it...

Thanks for this informative article. Once one has settled with HMRC, what becomes of the horrid loan scheme. Can they come back and ask you to pay the loan back, again, over paying to HMRC and the loan sharks? Surely that can’t be lawful, it would be like working for free...

Read More
Guest
There are no comments posted here yet

Leave your comments

  1. Posting comment as a guest.
Rate this post:
Attachments (0 / 3)
Share Your Location