VAT Cases & News

Summaries of interesting VAT cases for the SME owner.

In Westow Cricket Club v HMRC [2019] UKFTT 712 TC07484, the First Tier Tribunal (FTT) ruled that the Club did not have a reasonable excuse against a penalty for getting the zero-rating certificate wrong, after relying on a letter from HMRC.

In Dixons Retail Plc v HMRC [2019] TC07486, the appellant failed at a First Tier Tribunal (FTT) appeal in a bid to reclaim £1,876,141 of overpaid VAT on cheques which had been dishonoured, on the basis they were out of time for a refund.

In Medacy Ltd v HMRC [2019] UKFTT 0576, TC 07370, the First Tier Tribunal (FFT) concluded that pharmacist-led clinical services provided to GP practices were supplies of services, not staff, and therefore qualified for VAT exemption.

In Taylor Pearson (Construction) Ltd (TPCL) v HMRC TC07464, the First Tier Tribunal (FFT) concluded that input tax incurred on services provided by tax advisors for the company's directors was deductible.

In The Lilias Graham Trust (‘LGT’) v HMRC [2019] UKFTT 0552 TC07346, the First Tier Tribunal (FTT) concluded that a charity which assessed families referred to it by social services was supplying welfare services, therefore exemption applied.

In Charles John Caton v HMRC [2019] TC07343, the First Tier Tribunal (FTT) found that a café run by Mr Caton was separate from a restaurant run by his wife.

In RSR Sports Limited vs HMRC [2019] UKFTT 678, TC07450, the First Tier Tribunal (FTT) found that the provision of a holiday camp was a childcare enterprise, even though sports activities were an important element of the services provided.

 

Enjoying our content? 

Sign up now to receive our unique FREE Tax Planning Tips and Advice Guide & our FREE Newsletter.

.Squirrel ad