More Search Results
  • SME Tax News
  • Tax Data
  • Explore
  • Virtual Tax Partner ®
  • Login or out
  • Register or Subscribe
  • Autumn Budget 2025
  • Home
  • Starting In Business
  • Self Employed
    • What expenses can I claim?
      • Tax rules for different trades & professions
    • Essential know-how
    • Making Tax Digital
  • Partnerships
  • Incorporation
  • Directors
    • What expenses can I claim?
    • Tax-efficient remuneration
    • Essential know-how
  • Companies
    • Running the business
    • Reorganisations
    • Ceasing trading
    • Essential know-how
    • SEIS & EIS & SITR
    • R & D & Patent Box
    • Creative Industry Zone
  • Employers
    • Employee expenses
    • Employee benefits
    • Essential know-how
    • Real Time Information
  • Disguised Remuneration Zone
  • Capital Allowances
  • Private Client & Estate Planning
    • Capital Gains Tax
    • Inheritance Tax
    • Income, claims & reliefs
    • Trusts & Estates
  • Land & Property
  • Overseas & Residence
  • Devolved Taxes
    • Wales
    • Scotland
    • Northern Ireland
  • Penalties & Compliance
    • Penalties
    • Compliance
    • Appeals
  • Investigations & Enquiries
    • Disclosure opportunities
    • A tax inspector calls...
    • Investigation news
  • More Tax Guides
    • COVID-19
    • Autumn Budget 2024
    • Spring Budget 2024
    • Autumn Statement 2023
  • Gift Aid
  • VAT
    • VAT News & Cases
    • VAT
    • Making VAT Digital
  • Contact Us
  • About
    • Meet the team
  1. You are here:  
  2. Home
  3. VAT
  4. VAT News & Cases

VAT Cases & News

Summaries of interesting VAT cases for the SME owner.

Late VAT registration: penalty quashed for innocent error

Last Updated: 02 June 2017

In James Hillis v HMRC [2013] TC02611 a penalty for failure to notify liability for VAT was quashed by the FTT: HMRC failed to consider the compliance intention of the law.

  • A solicitor setting up a new practice failed to realise that turnover for VAT registration purposes should be calculated on a rolling basis. He was late in registering for VAT as a result.
  • HMRC issued a late registration penalty under schedule 41 FA 2008.
  • The taxpayer appealed he claimed that he had made an honest mistake and that there were special circumstances.

The FTT quashed the penalty: it was satisfied that HMRC’s decision on special circumstances in the appeal was flawed in that HMRC did not consider whether the penalty met the clear compliance intention of the law having regard to the Appellant’s individual circumstances.

Links

How to appeal a tax penalty (subscriber version)

James Hillis v HMRC [2013] TC02611

 

VAT payments can be allocated to current period first

Last Updated: 13 April 2017

In Swanfield Limited & Others v HMRC [2017] UKUT 0088 the Upper Tribunal (UT) held that VAT payments can be allocated to current period VAT in order to minimise default surcharges.

Read more …

No VAT refund for employment agency

Last Updated: 13 August 2018

In Adecco UK Limited & Others v HMRC [2017] UKUT 0113 the Upper Tribunal (UT) found that an employment agency, attempting to rely on the Reed decision, was making a supply of self-employed temporary workers for VAT purposes.

Read more …

VAT: Dwellings and planning conditions

Last Updated: 21 March 2017

Two recent cases demonstrate the importance of the timing of removing planning permission conditions when establishing what is a dwelling for VAT.

Read more …

White goods in new houses: is input VAT blocked?

Last Updated: 03 March 2017

In Taylor Wimpey plc v HMRC [2017] UKUT 0034 (TCC) the Upper Tribunal (UT) set out some principles for determining when builders can reclaim VAT on white goods fitted in new dwellings.

Read more …

Hire of taxis and insurance are separate supplies

Last Updated: 03 March 2017

In Wheels Private Hire Limited v HMRC [2017] UKUT 0051 (TCC) the Upper Tribunal (UT) held that a taxi firm made two independent supplies to its drivers for VAT purposes: an exempt supply of insurance and the standard rated hire of cars.

Read more …

Regulations invalid: VAT on employees' fuel is irrecoverable

Last Updated: 24 February 2017

In Marsh (Bolton) Limited and Others v HMRC [2017] UKFTT 0149, the First-Tier Tribunal (FTT) determined that the regulations allowing for employers to recover VAT on reimbursements of business mileage to employees are invalid.

Read more …

Page 69 of 77

  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73

 

🖨️ Print this page

 

Login

 

What's new?

  • SME Tax Update 20 August 2026
  • Second tax adviser registration window now open
  • FTT did not care for Covid-19 related R&D relief claim
  • Post-Mortem Reliefs
  • Carpet retailer lays down the law on VAT
  • SME Tax Update 13 August 2026
  • 436,000 taxpayers file under MTD for Income Tax
  • New online service for uploading compliance check documents
  • Property incorporation schemes not notifiable under DOTAS
  • UT finds director's loan was written off during liquidation
  • Employment-Related Securities Bulletin 68: August 2026
  • Quick Succession Relief
  • Appropriations to and from trading stock (companies)
  • Appropriations to and from trading stock (self-employed and partnerships)
  • Independent report published on post-OTS progress on tax simplification
  • Beneficiary makes trust-owned offshore company UK tax resident
  • SME Tax Update 6 August 2026
  • The 'life' of a company for IHT
20:20 Expert Led CPD

© 2026 RossMartin.co.uk

Terms & Privacy